Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Moving with the times...

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 1 Follower

L Spad
Top 500 Contributor
Brighton
Posts 271
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
L Spad Posted: Mon, Nov 27 2017 7:27 PM

Hi all,

I'm giving some serious thought to upgrading my current system with a B&O network link streaming device. My current system is as follows:

  • Video: Beovision 7-32 (main TV), Beocenter 6-26 (link room),
  • Audio: Beomaster 7000 (complete system) connected to the master link via a 1611 converter, four Beolink passives, two Beolink actives, and a Beoport (connected to my mac for iTunes)
  • I've got a Masterlink Gateway in the mix as well.

I'm really happy with the system, it all works great and the components are all in regular use (yes I still listen to vinyl, CD and even tapes occasion!) The system is interfaced with my home automation system so I don't want to move away from masterlink entirely, not to mention the fact that there is a significant investment there. It might seem crazy to hold onto the old audio system, but I really am not interested in ditching it.

What I'm thinking of is swapping out the trusty old Beoport for a modern streaming device, connected to the rest of my system via the ML/NL converter. At this stage I'm leaning towards an essence as the used price is now pretty tempting. My questions are:

  1. Is it possible for me to configure the ML/NL converter to allow me to listen to Spotify or Deezer from one of the B&O streaming devices by pressing N.Music on a Beo4 from my various link rooms (i.e. replicating the behaviour of the Beoport)?There isn't a lot of detail on the configuration options for the converter online so apologies for a dumb question!
  2. Is the essence the best choice for this? Would I need a MK2 to accomplish what I want, or would the MK1 suffice? Would I get any significant benefit from considering a Beosound core instead? I'm not overly fussed about the additional tablet etc offered by the moment and I'm hoping to keep costs reasonable.
  3. Will adding the ML/NL converter improve the user experience of the Beolink2 app when listening to sources from the Beomaster 7000?

I'm sure this topic must have been covered elsewhere on the forum, so apologies if there is already loads out there on this (I've been doing a bit of reading, but the forum being down earlier means I've probably missed a load of stuff) - grateful for any advice from people with experience of similar setups.

Many thanks, Luke

Stan
Top 100 Contributor
Chicago-area USA
Posts 869
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Stan replied on Mon, Nov 27 2017 8:22 PM

My 2 cents.

You can mimic the BeoPort behavior with an Essence + BLC.  That is, press N.Music, get TuneIn / Deezer -  Spotify may not work since it seems to require the Spotify app to do anything.  Unfortunately, my BLC is no longer operational so I can't try this.  This is a pretty expensive option if this is the only ML/NL integration required.

If you want to stay in the B&O family, I'd connect an Essence to the Aux IN of your BeoMaster (using a Sounds Heavenly PL to AUX cable) .  Otherwise, you can get a Chromecast audio (possibly others) and connect it to the Aux IN.  This assume you have an available Aux port and your Actives and Passives can pass the AUX command.

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Just adding....

I would not use the A.Aux connection.

The Passives/Actives might not support the A.Aux command (as Stan mentioned).

And besides it is used for the connection to the 1611.

Instead ditch the 7000 Tape deck (you probably don’t use that, or?) - and use that input instead.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

RaMaBo
Top 150 Contributor
near Munich
Posts 626
OFFLINE
Gold Member
RaMaBo replied on Mon, Nov 27 2017 10:52 PM

What Stan said is possibly the best way but the PL->Aux Cable should be connected to the Tape 2 connection because AUX of the Beomaster is already connected to the masterlink converter (1614/1611). This way the essence can be selected from ever link room with the A.TAPE2 command. The AUX command would also need a minimum software level of 1.6 (?) for the beolink active and a certain level (i think it's 1.6) for the beolink passive.

May be even cheaper is the Playmaker connected to TAPE 1, the Beocord 7000 connected then to Tape 2. This can then be controlled in the _main_ room as A.TAPE / A.MEM but gives no full masterlink control. It offers AirPlay, DLNA/UPnP and an additional Analog Input. The output level should be set to the fixed level so that the only volume control is via the Beomaster. The additional Analog In could be used for a chromecast audio.

 

 

EDIT: Millemissen was a bit faster Smile

Ralph-Marcus

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Tue, Nov 28 2017 6:28 AM
My 2 cents as an owner of a BLC nl/ml ... don’t bother; get essences or cores

BeoNut since '75

L Spad
Top 500 Contributor
Brighton
Posts 271
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
L Spad replied on Tue, Nov 28 2017 7:01 AM

Thanks all! Sounds like my best option is to connect an essence to the A.Tape 2 input (which is activated N.Music on a modern Beo4). All of my passive a/actives are the most recent software versions (required to pass light and command signals to the MLGW) but as you've rightly said I have the 1611 connected to A.Aux. 

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Have fun....moving with the times.

Lots of new possibilities with the Essence (2nd gen).

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS