ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022READ ONLY FORUM
This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022
Howdy,
I'm not sure that there's much for me to say about this article from B&O's perspective...
Speaking as a former recording engineer, there are some things that I firmly agree with - most notably:
The one-mic-per-loudspeaker philosophy is common. Pentatone does this for multichannel well. MANY 2.0 classical recordings are done this way - especially the smaller-label ones. It puts all the work up-front, because you can't "fix it in the mix" later. This technique can be done well (Morten does a good job!) and it can be done very poorly as well - so it's not a solution, it's "just" a philosophy.
If you're either interested in the math and psychoacoustics behind this philosophy of recording for multichannel, or you have trouble sleeping, you might find that this paper helps...
Cheers-geoff
Sorry... big error in there... That should have read
"When you watch Star Wars, you should NOT feel like you're in the Millenium Falcon - you're watching a story."
I type faster than I can think... And I don't type very fast...
-g
No problem, Geoff - just blame it on the hot summer weather ;-)
There is a tv - and there is a BV
Ah. when I read your initial response, I was a little confused. I agree with the B&O approach. I want to hear what the artist intended vs. trying to create a live performance.
B&O in my life 😊: