Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Engineering the immersive sound experience

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Barry Santini
Top 150 Contributor
New York
Posts 543
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Barry Santini Posted: Mon, Aug 10 2020 11:56 AM
Take a few minutes to read this story about 2L:

https://immersiveaudioalbum.com/2020/06/qa-with-morten-lindberg-2020-grammy-winner/

Maybe Geoff might chime in and say how B&O aligns or differs and why.
lawrencejmcook
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 742
OFFLINE
Founder
Fascinating. I like the “map one mic to one speaker” philosophy. I’ll have to explore their catalogue.

Thanks for sharing, Barry.

Lawrence
Geoff Martin
Top 150 Contributor
Struer, Denmark
Posts 672
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Howdy,

I'm not sure that there's much for me to say about this article from B&O's perspective... 

Speaking as a former recording engineer, there are some things that I firmly agree with - most notably:

  • that there's a "translation" between headphones and loudspeakers. You can learn the difference - but you always have to rememver that they're different
  • A recording is not intended to re-create a live experience. I say this every time we have someone visiting B&O... When you watch Star Wars, you should feel like you're in the Millenium Falcon - you're watching a story. Music recordings are the same. (Maybe that's the B&O perspective - we never try to make systems that make you think "you are there" or "they are here". We just try to make systems that faithfully reproduce what the recording and the mastering engineers heard when they did the recording.)

The one-mic-per-loudspeaker philosophy is common. Pentatone does this for multichannel well. MANY 2.0 classical recordings are done this way - especially the smaller-label ones. It puts all the work up-front, because you can't "fix it in the mix" later.  This technique can be done well (Morten does a good job!) and it can be done very poorly as well - so it's not a solution, it's "just" a philosophy.

If you're either interested in the math and psychoacoustics behind this philosophy of recording for multichannel, or you have trouble sleeping, you might find that this paper helps...

Cheers
-geoff

 

Geoff Martin
Top 150 Contributor
Struer, Denmark
Posts 672
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Sorry... big error in there... That should have read

"When you watch Star Wars, you should NOT feel like you're in the Millenium Falcon - you're watching a story."

I type faster than I can think... And I don't type very fast...

-g

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

No problem, Geoff - just blame it on the hot summer weather  ;-)

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Jaffrey2230
Top 150 Contributor
Washington DC
Posts 520
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Ah. when I read your initial response, I was a little confused. I agree with the B&O approach. I want to hear what the artist intended vs. trying to create a live performance.

B&O in my life 😊: 

 

  • Beolab 8002 + Beolab 2 + Beosound Core with Essence Remote (Office)
  • Beolab 6000 + Beolab 11 + Beosound Core with Essence Remote (Bedroom)
  • Beoplay A9 Mk2 (Living Room)
  • Beosound 1 with wireless dock (Portable)
  • Beosound Balance (Dining)
  • Beoplay H95 (Focused listening, travel)
  • Beoplay H9 (3rd gen) (retired)
  • Beoplay P6 (Portable)
  • Beotime wall clock (hallway entrance)
  • BMW X5 50i with B&O Audio Package (Commute/drive)

 

 

 

Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS