Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Beogram RX2 what Preamp?

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Robinsad
Not Ranked
Posts 4
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Robinsad Posted: Sun, May 16 2021 11:23 AM

Hi eweryone. Im new on this forum and I need your help.

I have beogram rx2 with MMC3 stylus connected to beomaster 6500 (recently bought almost the whole set 6500 and working absolutely perfect except turntable). I need your experts opinion what preamp I have to buy for reasonable money. Last couple of years my beogram (stylus is in almost perfect condition I think) was connected to my old Sony hifi system with build-in preamp (middle shelf) with Kef Qi7 speakers. I care a lot about my LP's and I love lessening music. 

Many Thanks for Your help

loureed5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 171
OFFLINE
Gold Member
loureed5 replied on Sun, May 16 2021 1:19 PM

Welcom to Beoworld Robinsad,

What makes you sure you need a pre-amp?

The technical specifications of the Beomaster 6500 say it has a pre-amp built in .

Maybe the fault is located somewhere else ?

regards

Noel.

 

Dillen
Top 10 Contributor
Copenhagen / Denmark
Posts 13,191
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
Dillen replied on Sun, May 16 2021 1:37 PM

In Beomaster 6500 the RIAA was an optional extra module you could have soldered in.

Martin

Robinsad
Not Ranked
Posts 4
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Robinsad replied on Sun, May 16 2021 1:40 PM

Hi Noel. Thanks for quick response. You are right but that's was optional and my model don't have build-in preamp

Robinsad
Not Ranked
Posts 4
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Robinsad replied on Sun, May 16 2021 1:45 PM

Thanks Martin. Where can I buy that module? 

Many Thanks

Dillen
Top 10 Contributor
Copenhagen / Denmark
Posts 13,191
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
Dillen replied on Sun, May 16 2021 2:38 PM

Robinsad:

Thanks Martin. Where can I buy that module? 

Many Thanks

Finding one will be difficult.
A Beogram 6500 would be easier - and a better deck, being tangential.

Martin

Robinsad
Not Ranked
Posts 4
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Robinsad replied on Sun, May 16 2021 3:05 PM

Oh yeah. But I already spent almost £2000 😕

loureed5
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 171
OFFLINE
Gold Member
loureed5 replied on Sun, May 16 2021 4:19 PM

Hello again,

If you can't get the module,or it's too expensive,you can buy a pre-amp from Sounds Heavenly for a very reasonable cost.

I don't know what country you're in but the pre-amp MD-001 Hyperwire is $117 AUS ,75.54 Euro,or 65 UK pounds.

I'm running a Beogram 2402 with a Beomaster 4500,neither of which has a pre-amp.So I bought the MD-001,and it works just fine with no appreciable loss of sound quality.

Hope this helps.

Noel.

 

Saint Beogrowler
Top 150 Contributor
Saint Paul
Posts 780
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
There are so many preamps under $500 that will make your mmc3 sing beautifully in this setup. Trying several of them for yourself is the best way to find what you like since it sounds like you appreciate music this way
AdamS
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 373
OFFLINE
Gold Member
AdamS replied on Mon, May 17 2021 1:45 PM

Dillen:

Finding one will be difficult.
A Beogram 6500 would be easier - and a better deck, being tangential.

Martin

I'm going to have to respectfully disagree on this one!

Despite the fact that the linear tracking Beograms have a higher perceived quality and are worth more money, it is my opinion that they simply don't sound as good as the radial tracking decks.

Dillen
Top 10 Contributor
Copenhagen / Denmark
Posts 13,191
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
Dillen replied on Mon, May 17 2021 2:40 PM

That's because you are one of the music listeners, who actually like a little distortion.
Nothing wrong with that. That's what makes some records and some older valve amplifiers sound warmer and more "natural" to those people exactly.

You are more than welcome to prefer radial decks.
Radial decks can be quite good,, also technically, but the unavoidable tracking angle error by radial decks alone puts them behind tangential decks technically, let alone antiskating issues etc.
Stylus and record lifespan's better on tangential decks too.
Nothing perceived. It's facts. Geeked

Martin

Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS