Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

LG 55EM9700 vs BV11

rated by 0 users
This post has 15 Replies | 1 Follower

Gatex
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 129
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Gatex Posted: Wed, Jan 2 2013 1:43 PM

CES2013 , its now for sure that LG will bring out the new OLED TV , for the same price(6000-7000 EUros) as the BV11.   low power, better contrast, thinner .

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Sfk4-jP34k

bayerische
Top 25 Contributor
Ekenäs, Finland
Posts 4,770
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

It's amazingly thin that's for sure. At some point TV's will become like wall paper. Very cool now, but once it's the norm, it's just that, the norm.

 

Nothing to design anymore. 

Too long to list.... 

Peter
Top 10 Contributor
Earsdon
Posts 11,991
OFFLINE
Founder
Peter replied on Wed, Jan 2 2013 2:40 PM

And what will the sound be like? I prefer my BV5 over a BV10 mainly because the sound is so much better. Make the speakers paper thin and they will sound even worse or you will need boxes next to the thin set which rather makes the thinness pointless.

Peter

bayerische
Top 25 Contributor
Ekenäs, Finland
Posts 4,770
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Peter:

And what will the sound be like? I prefer my BV5 over a BV10 mainly because the sound is so much better. Make the speakers paper thin and they will sound even worse or you will need boxes next to the thin set which rather makes the thinness pointless.

Peter, I regret getting the BV10, and trading my BV5! And I did  it only because I got "pushed" by Full-HD marketing... No point, I should have saved the BV5, and put the 5k euro difference on something more meaningful. 

 

 

Too long to list.... 

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
The days of tv's being boxes, or now slabs are shortly to end. The application of an OLED type film to a surface or wall are upon us. Speakers like the 12 series will fit in perfectly to what essentially will end up being like thick wallpaper.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Paul W
Top 75 Contributor
London
Posts 1,810
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Paul W replied on Wed, Jan 2 2013 5:27 PM

Totally agree with you Chris, just like hi-fi is no longer part of the furniture, the same will happen for TVs and I say thank goodness! Speaker wise it isn't a problem hence the huge success of sound bar speakers and of course home cinema systems for the past 15 years. Certainly the new OLED is going to make the BV7-55 and the BV4-85 the fat kid over night! I raise my glass to this new technology!

Peter
Top 10 Contributor
Earsdon
Posts 11,991
OFFLINE
Founder
Peter replied on Wed, Jan 2 2013 5:43 PM

Paul W:
Speaker wise it isn't a problem hence the huge success of sound bar speakers and of course home cinema systems for the past 15 years.

But it is a problem! Most surround speakers are rubbish ! You need a decent centre speaker and also surrounds. These need to have volume and are therefore incongruous with paper thin screens. I do like the idea of paper thin screens but don't know how they will work well with speaker technology. I suppose in wall could work but this is a fair undertaking in an older house like mine with stone walls! Sad

Peter

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
So do I. Embrace this fantastic and what would have been just a short time ago, space age stuff. Discreet, a fantastic picture and mated to say the 12's I was listening too today, amazing.

The 7-55 would be my TV of choice if finances allowed, but how it will stack up technically in just say 5 years is anyone's guess. Must be very hard making plans for the future in the AV world, for relatively small companies like B&O.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

bayerische
Top 25 Contributor
Ekenäs, Finland
Posts 4,770
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Many people don't want a surround setup, I for one have no use for it. 

 

 

Too long to list.... 

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder

Most of the comments about how speakers would fit in assume that the manufacturers' approach to speakers won't change ... but current speakers try to reproduce the air movement (sound waves) that originated at the source by sympathetically vibrating a remote surface; 

  • what if someone like a Dyson decide to try another approach to stimulating the movement of air ?
  • what if we were happy to have headphone (with noise suppression) cams wrapped around our 3D glasses ?
  • what if we were with wireless earbuds ?
  • what if Cochlear came up with an approach ?

maybe one day speaker technology will be transformed as opposed to being enhanced (i.e. the fundamental principle of today's speakers, the vibrating diaphragm, has not changed since Thomas Edison / Alexander Graham Bell.

But what do I know .... I am no physicist !

BeoNut since '75

Aussie Michael
Top 25 Contributor
Melbourne, AU
Posts 3,730
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Yes the sound will be the decider. That's why even the Beovision 8 is one of my all time favourite televisions.

It's not a bad thing being the fat kid.
Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Tell me about it..

The speaker debate is a nonsense in my book. Tv viewing and the screens are changing and will keep doing so. There just needs to be a technical answer that the beovision 12-65 goes some way to solving. Separate AV box for sound and vision. Beolab 12 type speakers for sound.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Aussie Michael
Top 25 Contributor
Melbourne, AU
Posts 3,730
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Perhaps that technology where it uses a certain wireless technology. Didn't they do HDMI over wireless a few years back or try it?
Rolf 2
Top 500 Contributor
Germany
Posts 324
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Rolf 2 replied on Thu, Jan 3 2013 11:03 AM

I may bring in another point: The connections and connectivity required to attach e. g. a third party unit. If you watch the video closely, it shows that the TV is very thin, but it has a socket. In which probably might be built in the HDMI, power supply and others. Also a WLAN/LAN connectivity needs to be built in somewhere. So this might bring opportunities for design and speaker relations, because as of today you need always a connector panel which requires more space then 4 mm depth. That might change, but foreseeable not in the near or middle future.

As for speakers: You could think of a new era of the electro static speakers (I hope this is the correct english term?). See an example what I mean here. They are e. g. also available from Loewe or speaker specialists for this kind of speakers. And, as far as I´m aware of, they are active speakers.

However, the OLED seems to have a fantatstic picture. And size will not matter with this technology in terms of weight and material. Three or four years ago they presented at the CeBit exhibition at Hannover, Germany, a foil that could be sprayed upon a lot of surfaces and was capable of reproducing a TV picture.

Same, by the way, for speakers: Wiring my house with Master Link, my dealer offered me what I call "foil speakers". They should fit underneath the wallpaper, reproducing music not with the loudness and depth of the usual speakers but fairly loud and good enough to use them e. g. in the aisle or gallery.

Kind regards,

Rolf

bayerische
Top 25 Contributor
Ekenäs, Finland
Posts 4,770
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Rolf, yes electrostatic speakers could work, but the problem with them is perhaps the lack of evolution, just as with normal speakers...

 

They need to be huge, not deep, but a very big "foil" area to produce sound. They cannot produce low frequencies. 

 

But on the other hand, yes a wall paper like TV would be very cool! And I can live with less audio quality. If one could wall-paper a 85" or more TV to the bedroom wall! 

Too long to list.... 

vikinger
Top 25 Contributor
Vestri Kirkjubyr, UK
Posts 5,422
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Just imagine the wall preparation you would need to get a flat surface for an 85" paper thin screen!

On the other hand, a rigid 85" screen will always need a fair thickness so that it will be structurally adequate for handling etc.

I think we will get paper like screens but they will be used more for instantly changeable wall paper patterns or murals rather than as television screens. They may become new ways of room lighting.

Graham

Page 1 of 1 (16 items) | RSS