Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Some people are just...

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 2 Followers

Dennis
Top 150 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 627
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Dennis Posted: Fri, Apr 25 2014 11:38 PM

I know sound is a matter of personal taste, but I shook my head a bit, when I read the comments on this thread... 

That's one of the reasons why I buy so much B&O equipment whenever I come across it, cause I can't bear the thought of if someone like the persons in the thread above should get hold of it... 

Feel free to post links to similar head-shaking topics like the eBay auction with the "slightly" modified BeoMaster 901 Søren linked to. 

/Dennis

Søren Mexico
Top 10 Contributor
Mexico City
Posts 6,411
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Well, the thread is from 2011, so the speakers are surely destroyed and dumped by now, a couple of new surrounds, caps and some TLC would have saved them. At times I do buy B&O I dont need, cheap but maybe saveable. But at the moment all US bay prices went haywire, so I will have to wait for better times.

Collecting Vintage B&O is not a hobby, its a lifestyle.

John Francis
Top 500 Contributor
USA
Posts 155
OFFLINE
Silver Member

I suspect that the poster on that particular forum and the individual who replied to his post are both the kind of individuals who would kick a puppy.

John

chartz
Top 25 Contributor
Burgundy, France
Posts 4,171
OFFLINE
Gold Member
chartz replied on Sat, Apr 26 2014 7:28 AM

Unfriendly comments like this about B&O are very common all through the world. I guess they are most of the time from people who have never got anywhere near B&O equipment. Those gents' favourite comparison is Bose stuff, which I will steer clear of. The only common factor between those brands is high price-tags.

But why B&O is systematically rejected by the audiophile community I cannot understand. I know people who get scared at the idea of turning the tiniest screw of a Beomaster, and who just  love Japanese contemporary equipment, often not so well designed (boxes full of air).

Oh well.

Jacques

Peter
Top 10 Contributor
Earsdon
Posts 11,991
OFFLINE
Founder
Peter replied on Mon, Apr 28 2014 3:34 PM

Typical comment from someone who has not listened to a pair. The surround on the phase link unit does perish though and these will probably also need new capacitors, of which there are a lot! However these are well balanced accurate speakers if a bit on the large side!

Peter

Doonesbury
Top 500 Contributor
Landisville, PA, USA
Posts 168
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

chartz:

But why B&O is systematically rejected by the audiophile community I cannot understand. I know people who get scared at the idea of turning the tiniest screw of a Beomaster, and who just  love Japanese contemporary equipment, often not so well designed (boxes full of air).

Oh well.

My guess for this, having read a few issues of Stereophile and hung with an audiophile many years ago, is probably due to the active speakers with digital amplifiers and the lack of needing to "tweak" their system with various add-ons of questionable worth.

D

Andrew
Top 100 Contributor
Frinton, UK
Posts 917
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Andrew replied on Wed, May 7 2014 9:39 AM

what a waste - I'd love a pair for free!

On a similar note some friends of mine bought a sound server and had some bespoke system installed around the house coupled to plasma TV;s - cost well over £30k - they dissed B&O and thought this much better. Upshot was that the remotes never worked, TVs constantly failing and five years later completely out of date - they moved house and had to leave it all in the old one and start again - had they bought B&O they could have moved it with them and it will still all work with new stuff! Cant help but laugh at some peoples ignorance.

Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS