Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

The worlds first high resolution wireless audio player - oh my gosh!

rated by 0 users
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member
Millemissen Posted: Mon, Jul 7 2014 1:01 PM

In the CE Week 2014 a couple of weeks ago Sharp presented, what they claim to be 'the worlds first high resolution audio player'.

It is a combined player for Blu Ray's, SACD's, networked audio etc and transmits the sound via WiSA.

http://www.sharpusa.com/ForHome/HomeEntertainment/Audio/wisa.aspx

Lo and behold - the player will be avaible in september this year.

 

BUT WE KNOW BETTER - some of us even use that feature in our daily life without boasting much about it.

Every BV11/Avant can do these things already (if you include a good BRP for the optical media) - the V1/BV12NG/BSys4 with the Transmitter.

Some of us have the OPPO player to do the disc's, and the built-in Media Player/Renderer can play the networked files easily.

 

Once again our friends in Struer are way ahead of the rest of the A/V-world.

The guys from the big companies just don't seem to notice that!

I wonder which loudspeakers Onkyo are going to suggest for their 'worlds first...' Confused

 

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoBoy68
Top 75 Contributor
Alsace 🇨🇵
Posts 1,247
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
@ Millemissen

Bang & Olufsen is often ahead but they don't inform press media and dealers about possibilities.

Very stupid communication. Embarrassed

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

I don't think that that is the problem - especially not in the last year or two.

They seem to have been neglected - or rather not understood - from the so-called A/V experts.

Hopefully that will change.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Puncher
Top 10 Contributor
Durham
Posts 11,729
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher replied on Mon, Jul 7 2014 2:20 PM

Millemissen:
Every BV11/Avant can do these things already (if you include a good BRP for the optical media)

And there we have it, B&O can't actually do all hi-res audio formats, it needs someone else's player to provide a pcm stream and so it is a stretch to call it a "high resolution audio player", maybe Sharp are right after all!!

 

Ban boring signatures!

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
I wonder if they will ever make some WISA H6's?

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Puncher:

And there we have it, B&O can't actually do all hi-res audio formats, it needs someone else's player to provide a pcm stream and so it is a stretch to call it a "high resolution audio player", maybe Sharp are right after all!!

As we know a lot of people don't care for the optical media anymore.

With the B&O product you have the choice, if you want to transfer sound from them too (by adding a player)  - with the Sharp product you have to buy the whole package.

Whether you decode 'here' or 'there' doesn't matter. 

Besides - for the Sharp player to work you need to add a monitor/a tv - so maybe Sharp aren't right after all!

Just another way of seeing this.

 

In general I would rather not compare these two products. 

The Sharp looks a great product to me.

If it wasn't for the pricetag, it could be a competitor for the OPPO (no need for WiSA support then)?

 

What was interesting, is that the Sharp WISA player will be on sale september this year - B&O have had support for WiSA a year by then.

 

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Barry Santini
Top 150 Contributor
New York
Posts 543
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher:

And there we have it, B&O can't actually do all hi-res audio formats, it needs someone else's player to provide a pcm stream and so it is a stretch to call it a "high resolution audio player", maybe Sharp are right after all!!

Ban boring signatures!

Geez, why does anyone think they really need greater than 96khz/24 bit. If you've completely vetted your listening room's power and frequency response, maybe. If not, waste of money.

B
Puncher
Top 10 Contributor
Durham
Posts 11,729
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher replied on Tue, Jul 8 2014 8:01 AM

Barry Santini:
Puncher:

 

And there we have it, B&O can't actually do all hi-res audio formats, it needs someone else's player to provide a pcm stream and so it is a stretch to call it a "high resolution audio player", maybe Sharp are right after all!! 

 

Geez, why does anyone think they really need greater than 96khz/24 bit. If you've completely vetted your listening room's power and frequency response, maybe. If not, waste of money. 

B

My comment wasn't about whether it's needed, just whether it can or can not.

Ban boring signatures!

Doonesbury
Top 500 Contributor
Landisville, PA, USA
Posts 168
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

There was an interesting commentary in Sound and Vision magazine about the necessity and effectiveness of high resolution music.  It was also nice that the author mentioned one of my favorite bands.

Read it here:

http://www.soundandvision.com/content/beware-spinal-tap-syndrome

D

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

What was discussed in that article was not the music, but the equipment.

"'Enter the new generation of audio players that are spec’d at 32-bit quantization, and 384-kHz sampling frequency."

Another - surely more important - discussion would be:

'Where is the music, the source material in 32/384 quality?

I don't see anything anywhere - not even near that!

Marketing gear with these specs is pure hype.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

beojeff
Top 50 Contributor
USA
Posts 2,012
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beojeff replied on Mon, Dec 1 2014 7:20 PM

BeoBoy68:
@ Millemissen

 

Bang & Olufsen is often ahead but they don't inform press media and dealers about possibilities.

 

 

Very stupid communication. Embarrassed

 

I think that a great example of this was when B&O introduced the BeoLink PC2 with N.Music and N.Radio capability. At that time, early in the days of MP3s, there was nothing else like it. The ability to access your music collection from your computer from any linked room in the house was truly revolutionary. Yet, B&O did not take the opportunity to aggressively advertise this!

Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS