ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022READ ONLY FORUM
This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022
With all this net link stuff,why can't your b & o tv send what your watcing/recorded to another tv from its drive? Sort of follow me from one tv to another! A year ago I did hear of something called push tv for the Avant but nothing more or have I got this wrong?
If this company can do it why not b & o?
All Reference screens feature an anti-reflective, high-contrast glass filter panel.The sets also have onboard PVRs with a built-in 1TB hard drive. As well as recording and archiving programmes, this DR+ HDD also acts as a video server that can be accessed by other Loewe sets in a home network, using DR+ Streaming. Viewers can alo pause a programme and pick up where they left off on another DR+-equipped TV in a different room, so-called DR+ Follow Me.
Content licensing is the big issue.
That's always been the block but if so, how come loewe can it on there sets but not b &o?
Is there really a cost to do that?
I often think about this and the cost of installing all those cables to make this function, so i thought i'd never spend that money and i just pay an extra $10 per month for an extra foxtel box in other rooms :-)
So it's kind of like follow me because i can pick up where i left off in one room :-)
Aussie Michael:I often think about this and the cost of installing all those cables to make this function, so i thought i'd never spend that money and i just pay an extra $10 per month for an extra foxtel box in other rooms :-) So it's kind of like follow me because i can pick up where i left off in one room :-)
BeoNut since '75
https://www.pulse-eight.com/p/180/neo4-basic
fully PUC compatible and very reliable compared to some HD Matrix brands........
also will work with other brand sof TVs in the secondary (eg childrens rooms).
Cabling v cheap Cat5e or Cat6.
IMHO anythign with Loewe on it AVOID!
elephant: Aussie Michael: I often think about this and the cost of installing all those cables to make this function, so i thought i'd never spend that money and i just pay an extra $10 per month for an extra foxtel box in other rooms :-) So it's kind of like follow me because i can pick up where i left off in one room :-) Trust me ... I wish I had done that instead of buying the analogue solution B&O provided. It was never consistent, and the quality was inferior. I was too enamoured with trying the B&O live style way ... Instead I should have simply gone down your path !
Aussie Michael: I often think about this and the cost of installing all those cables to make this function, so i thought i'd never spend that money and i just pay an extra $10 per month for an extra foxtel box in other rooms :-) So it's kind of like follow me because i can pick up where i left off in one room :-)
Trust me ... I wish I had done that instead of buying the analogue solution B&O provided.
It was never consistent, and the quality was inferior.
I was too enamoured with trying the B&O live style way ... Instead I should have simply gone down your path !
Masterlink and coaxial was OK for standard def to a second link TV, but the quality was definitely degraded. Taking the broadcast signal direct to each separate TV gives better quality, but it's highly likely that the TV's or set top boxes will have fractionally different processing times, creating a very annoying echo in room positions where both TV's can be heard.
Graham
elephant:Trust me ... I wish I had done that instead of buying the analogue solution B&O provided. It was never consistent, and the quality was inferior. I was too enamoured with trying the B&O live style way ... Instead I should have simply gone down your path ! BeoNut since '75