Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Beovision 5 or 7-40?

rated by 0 users
This post has 9 Replies | 2 Followers

Rugmel
Not Ranked
Posts 2
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Rugmel Posted: Tue, Dec 15 2015 10:34 AM

Hi all !

I am considering buying a beovision 5, because the prices now a days are reasonable in my oppinion... But is it possible to get a decent picturequality by using an eksternal digital reciever or should i rather go for the beovision 7-40 instead?

Whats your oppinion, pros/cons?  

kai
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 362
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
kai replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 10:43 AM

the only issue I can see is speaking to a friend who happens to be a bang and olufsen repairer is that they seem to be discontinuing a lot of parts for the older tv's, 

carreracs
Not Ranked
Posts 44
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
carreracs replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 10:50 AM

I'd go for the 7-40, if you go for the BV5, buy a HD version. Not many of them around though....

Christian 

Beobuddy
Top 25 Contributor
Utrecht, The Netherlands
Posts 3,972
OFFLINE
Founder
Beobuddy replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 11:16 AM

Only a BV5 HD version can handle the hd(ready) picture format's. It has just 1 HD input.

If you would buy a BV7-40, then I would advise to buy a mk3 or higher. These are based on the Beosystem 3 engine. These are more expensive than the MK1 or MK2.

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
I agree. The picture of the mk3 and above is far superior to the 5, it has HDMI inputs and the Beosystem 3.

Both have great sound, but the 7-40 also has a DVD-Bluray player. There are rumours of a new cheap Beovision coming out in the first quarter 2016. Cheaper than the V1, and of a more conventional designYes - thumbs up

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Rugmel:

Hi all !

I am considering buying a beovision 5, because the prices now a days are reasonable in my oppinion... But is it possible to get a decent picturequality by using an eksternal digital reciever or should i rather go for the beovision 7-40 instead?

Whats your oppinion, pros/cons?  

If you have other B&O devices with the MasterLink interface, you should go for a BV7 MK3 or higher.

Stay away from the MK 2 and 1, if you need it for a main tv.

Even if you want an external box for tv viewing, go for something with FullDH and HDMI.

If no MasterLink in your setup (or you simply start off with B&O by now), you might - as Chris noted - do well waiting for, what will soon come from B&O.

Watch out at your local B&O and/or stay tuned on the forum.

My advice!

 

That said - if you could get hold on one of the last (HD) versions of the BV5 at a good price, it is a nice tv ;-)

 

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Rugmel
Not Ranked
Posts 2
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Rugmel replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 3:33 PM

Thanks guys.... sounds like i should go for the 7-40....

Paul W
Top 75 Contributor
London
Posts 1,810
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Paul W replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 3:47 PM

Mk4 or new for the BV7. The MK3 had the dodgy dark screen of the Samsung 2009 era.  Moxxie will explain this issue! In all, cases, you are buying VERY VERY VERY VERY OLD LCD technology and my word, LCD has improved considerably in the last two or three years. You've really got to be obsessed about a brand to buy into old LCD technology. For instance my old BV6 was incapable of showing black. On the film credits, it was a damn grey instead of black. It was incredibly noticeable even to a non tv viewer like myself. Just be very very careful!

butch1
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 384
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
butch1 replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 7:45 PM

I had a bv5 HD from new, still with family member.It has very good picture and sound, it has one HD input but I connected HD fury to vga to allow another.iconic design to, and the Panasonic commercial panels are built to last.

i own 2 bv7-40 mk 6 led, but before that, I had a mk2, and mk3.

I think the mark 2 was a better TV than the 3, granted it never had hdmi inputs or 1080p panel but I used HD fury 2 so had 2 hdmi inputs so ran sky HD and Apple TV 3 fine.

Most of the TV I watched was 50/50 HD and SD I watched, so the 720p panel was better for that anyways and I also found the mark 3 dark I was swayed by the 1080p hype and better connections.The mark 6 was a revelation and I think it has a better picture than any beovision produced today.

You can get a mark 2 for £500 and a mk3 for double that for a few convenient inputs and 1080 p screen which is pointless on a 40" TV.

butch1
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 384
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
butch1 replied on Tue, Dec 15 2015 7:54 PM

Paul W.

Mk4 or new for the BV7. The MK3 had the dodgy dark screen of the Samsung 2009 era.  Moxxie will explain this issue! In all, cases, you are buying VERY VERY VERY VERY OLD LCD technology and my word, LCD has improved considerably in the last two or three years. You've really got to be obsessed about a brand to buy into old LCD technology. For instance my old BV6 was incapable of showing black. On the film credits, it was a damn grey instead of black. It was incredibly noticeable even to a non tv viewer like myself. Just be very very careful!

Paul,  a beovision 7 is much more advanced in picture and sound  than a bv6-22 which was their first lcd to replace mx 4200 21" and was inferior to that.That is why it was dumped for a bc 6-23 which was far better.

A 2007 bv7-40 mk2 showing an HD image can still compete with a (PC world special ,fully stickered down the sides TV)for a natural, enjoyable image without straining your eyes, we take vision clear for granted but I could not live without it.

Page 1 of 1 (10 items) | RSS