Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Moment and NAS/DLNA experience

rated by 0 users
This post has 12 Replies | 2 Followers

Weebyx
Top 75 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 1,213
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Weebyx Posted: Wed, Mar 1 2017 7:26 AM

Hi All

Would be nice to have a thread with input for all the DLNA(id3/cover..) questions regarding the Moment.

I am so glad I bought the Moment, and Deezer has almost all music I like, but some of my CD's are not there, so I am thinking about getting a NAS for this.

I have tested Twonky 8.4 with iTunes on my Mac running Sierra, and this works perfect. Ripping cd's in Apple Lossles (m4p) is fine, and albums and tagging works perfect.

But.. Since Twonky is not supported on QNap any more(maybe with hacks), is the Moment 2.x FW ready and working with other DLNA servers, maybe the Synology Play series or something else ?

What DLNA/NAS are you guys using, and what format are you ripping CD's in ?

Thanks

/Jacob

Hiort
Top 50 Contributor
Sweden
Posts 2,895
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Hiort replied on Wed, Mar 1 2017 8:41 AM

Great that you like Moment Smile  Moment surely deserve some love now after the new firmware release.

I switched from Twonky running on my iMac and serving content from my DS212J Synology NAS to a setup where I only use the Media Manager in my Synology NAS. 

It works very well (running the 2.x firmware), and my feeling is that B&O are making Moment less dependent on Twonky. I think the main benefit with Twonky is that playlists works.

I have have ripped files in Apple Lossless and FLAC format and either works well with Moment.

 

 

 

 

Livingroom: BL3, BL11, BV11-46 Kitchen: Beosound 1 GVA, Beocom 2 Bathroom: M3 Homeoffice: M3, Beocom 2  Library: Beosound Emerge, Beocom 6000 Bedroom: M5, Essence remote  Travel: Beoplay E8 2.0, Beoplay EQ, Beoplay Earset

Weebyx
Top 75 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 1,213
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Weebyx replied on Wed, Mar 1 2017 8:59 AM

Hiort:

Great that you like Moment Smile  Moment surely deserve some love now after the new firmware release.

I switched from Twonky running on my iMac and serving content from my DS212J Synology NAS to a setup where I only use the Media Manager in my Synology NAS. 

It works very well (running the 2.x firmware), and my feeling is that B&O are making Moment less dependent on Twonky. I think the main benefit with Twonky is that playlists works.

I have have ripped files in Apple Lossless and FLAC format and either works well with Moment.

Sounds great with Synology working :) I don't use playlists on twonky (yet), but does that not work with Synology then ? It is a minor thing, if the albums and covers work, then this is fine with me :)

/Weebyx

Aussie Michael
Top 25 Contributor
Melbourne, AU
Posts 3,730
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
What is the difference with the synology play NAs compared to normal?

Someone recommended a Synology 416 play NAS but is it good ?

Why the play moniker ?
Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Seems that the 'play' versions are more powerfull and have a Hardware Transcoding Engine.

You will benefit from this, if you play videomaterial (in high quality) from it.

For use with the Moment, the 'mormal' version will be fine.

The OS will be the same on both.

MM

 

There is a tv - and there is a BV

mbee
Top 75 Contributor
Paris, France
Posts 1,842
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
mbee replied on Wed, Mar 1 2017 12:45 PM

Millemissen is right : the "Play" versions have a hardware decoding chip embedded for video trasncoding.

BUT this chip is quite useless if you use a video player that decodes the files itself. It's quite strange to trasncode on the NAS side and play only limited formats on the player side. It's better to upgrade the player to something more powerful than trying to find a player that is compatible with the NAS chip. It seems that even Plex is not compatible with the embedded Synology chip.

On an other side, the Play range is more focused on the multimedia user vs geek/enterprise user typical for this kind of stuff, so some details may be better for your usage. But don't expect anything from the hardware decoding capability.

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Useless or not is a big question.

For some users this will be welcomed, if their player does not play all kinds of exotic formats (that you/they might find on the internet).

I guess it is also the aim for a NAS developer, that his product may serve the most users/players.

That aside - there is no need for such a powerfull machine just to serve the BS Moment with files to play.

A good DLNA server can run on less powerfull machines, than the NAS's, they offer today - even a Raspberry Pi 3 will do.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

mbolo01
Top 50 Contributor
Louannec - France
Posts 2,035
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
mbolo01 replied on Wed, Mar 1 2017 5:11 PM
Weebyx:

Since Twonky is not supported on QNap any mor

Twonky is fully supported on QNAP in its commercial version, including in the coming QTS upgrade. Only the OEM version will disappear from QNAP App Store. I have installed the 8.4 version on my TS251 and it works like a charm, much more faster than native DLNA and fully supported by B&O

BS Moment, BS Core, BG 4002, BC 4500, BS1, BL18, BL19, BL8000 + RCV1, A6, M5, M3, A1, P6 (tks Botty), H5, TR1

Vintage_B&O
Top 500 Contributor
Germany
Posts 303
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Where can I download the full version of twonky?

Chris
Top 75 Contributor
Ostend-BE
Posts 1,170
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Chris replied on Thu, Mar 2 2017 5:34 AM

MircoHH:

Where can I download the full version of twonky?

http://www.twonkyforum.com/downloads/

"Believe nothing you read and only half of what you see, let your ears tell you the truth."

Weebyx
Top 75 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 1,213
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Weebyx replied on Thu, Mar 2 2017 4:36 PM

Millemissen:

Useless or not is a big question.

For some users this will be welcomed, if their player does not play all kinds of exotic formats (that you/they might find on the internet).

I guess it is also the aim for a NAS developer, that his product may serve the most users/players.

That aside - there is no need for such a powerfull machine just to serve the BS Moment with files to play.

A good DLNA server can run on less powerfull machines, than the NAS's, they offer today - even a Raspberry Pi 3 will do.

MM

Have actually right now, tested Twonky 8.4 on a RaspberryPi with a 64GB MicroSD :)

Works just fine, and makes no noise, and uses less power..

/Jacob

kimhav
Top 500 Contributor
Malmo, Sweden
Posts 314
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
kimhav replied on Tue, Mar 7 2017 9:31 AM

Question regarding Device Security settings or rather the Device Config; for the Moment would it make any difference to set the Media Receiver Type to Bang & Olufsen - Anyone played around with this and noticed any difference?

mbolo01
Top 50 Contributor
Louannec - France
Posts 2,035
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
mbolo01 replied on Tue, Mar 7 2017 9:48 AM
kimhav:

Anyone played around with this and noticed any difference?

I tried several combinations without noticing any impact, I recommend letting the Moment and Twonky agreeing themselves on the type

BS Moment, BS Core, BG 4002, BC 4500, BS1, BL18, BL19, BL8000 + RCV1, A6, M5, M3, A1, P6 (tks Botty), H5, TR1

Page 1 of 1 (13 items) | RSS