Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

HDMI CEC protocol

rated by 0 users
This post has 9 Replies | 3 Followers

Sebastien
Not Ranked
Posts 6
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Sebastien Posted: Sat, Nov 17 2012 12:05 PM

Gents,

does B&O support the CEC protocol over HDMI?

This will allow the TV to send a command to the STB that tells it to turn off. This is important as it will reduce the amount of used bandwidth when TV's are off. If this works, turning the TV off will turn the STB off which will release the bandwidth.

 

Seba.

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Sat, Nov 17 2012 4:48 PM

Sebastien:

Gents,

does B&O support the CEC protocol over HDMI?

This will allow the TV to send a command to the STB that tells it to turn off. This is important as it will reduce the amount of used bandwidth when TV's are off. If this works, turning the TV off will turn the STB off which will release the bandwidth.

 

Seba.

 

I suspect so; but I also suspect the implementation varies by BeoVision.

On my BV8-32 I have to use menus to switch off the Apple TV before I put the BV to stand-by.

On my BV8-40 I usually just have to put it to stand-by, and a second latter its ATV goes to stand-by.

Both ATVs have HDMI cables, both are Apple HDMI cables although possibly a year apart and so maybe different HDMI standards, one ATV is a 720 model - the other is the 1080 model (a year older).

BeoNut since '75

hfat
Top 150 Contributor
Vienna, Austria
Posts 663
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
hfat replied on Sat, Nov 17 2012 5:29 PM

As far as I know B&O do not support HDMI CEC. They use their PUC technology to control external devices.

hfat

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Sat, Nov 17 2012 5:38 PM

hfat:

As far as I know B&O do not support HDMI CEC. They use their PUC technology to control external devices.

hfat

Then the different behaviour I see is the result of different PUC implementations

Or different versions of the same implementation

So 3!!! possibilities for my differences

Anything is possible in the wonderful world of B&O

Big Smile

BeoNut since '75

stefan
Top 50 Contributor
200 miles from Struer
Posts 2,920
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
stefan replied on Sat, Nov 17 2012 7:03 PM

I hope, they do not support HDMI CEC.

Would always turn on the main BV, when I`m using the HDMI devices from linkrooms....

Stefan

 

Stoobietoo
Top 150 Contributor
Exeter, Devon, UK
Posts 692
OFFLINE
Gold Member

elephant:

Then the different behaviour I see is the result of different PUC implementations

Big Smile

On my Beosystem 3, when you are connecting up sources to be controlled by the PUC,  you get 4 choices 

1. Off at source change.

2. Off at TV Standby 

3. Always on

4. Manual control 

This is probably why you have differences.

Stoobie 

 

Andrew
Top 100 Contributor
Frinton, UK
Posts 917
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Andrew replied on Fri, May 29 2020 1:11 PM

CEC does not always work that well - at least on the set I have it doesn't always map keys, fails to switch things on or off and omits key functions. The B&O PUC system is much better.

kawo
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 148
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
kawo replied on Sat, May 30 2020 3:41 AM

I still have to test it because I do not have a CEC enabled device currently, but my dealer told if you connect such a device to a LG HDMI port (not the ones at the Soundcenter) sitting on top of a Harmony or Stage, you can remote control the device with your Beoremote One. So should work with an Eclipse as well.

When my Harmony will be up and running I will give it a try.

ngnear
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 245
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
ngnear replied on Sat, May 30 2020 10:46 AM
Yet another thread “raised from the dead“ by a spammer. Surprise
tournedos
Top 10 Contributor
Finland
Posts 7,357
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Moderator
tournedos replied on Sun, May 31 2020 10:10 PM

ngnear:
Yet another thread “raised from the dead“ by a spammer. Surprise

Correct. Rather frustrating, because these kind of spammers usually only make that one post, so banning & deleting is mostly just fruitless work Angry

--mika

Page 1 of 1 (10 items) | RSS