Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

A9 to arrive in store on Monday ;-)

rated by 0 users
This post has 90 Replies | 4 Followers

BeoBoy68
Top 75 Contributor
Alsace 🇨🇵
Posts 1,247
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Thanks MikaelHansen for shooting your wall mount. Looks like an orthopedical part. ! Sad

Michael: I am a purist and  Idon't want spray in gray or black the wooden feet. Wink

STB Brackets reply me by email in 6 hours only (not like B&O in 7 days) !!  

Gary the boss write me a letter (not 5 words like B&O)  that STB will launch in late February

or March 2013 , 2 versions feet for the BeoPlay A9 ! One in aluminium and the second in black.

Very nice company STB, they listen customers. All BeoFans will be satisfied soon ! Smile

BeoBoy68
Top 75 Contributor
Alsace 🇨🇵
Posts 1,247
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Thanks MikaelHansen for shooting your wall mount. Looks like an orthopedical part. ! Sad

Michael: I am a purist and  Idon't want spray in gray or black the wooden feet. Wink

STB Brackets reply me by email in 6 hours only (not like B&O in 7 days) !!  

Gary the boss write me a letter (not 5 words like B&O)  that STB will launch in late February

or March 2013 , 2 versions feet for the BeoPlay A9 ! One in aluminium and the second in black.

Very nice company STB, they listen customers. All BeoFans will be satisfied soon ! Smile

Gavin
Not Ranked
Sydney
Posts 22
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Gavin replied on Tue, Jan 15 2013 3:15 AM

In response to this picture of the A9 connections. Did anyone notice the optical connector just above the ethernet socket?

There is no red glow from the connector so I'm assuming it is an input but there are no references to it being used in the current firmware.

Can anyone shed any further light on this (pardon the pun!)

 

Gavin

Puncher
Top 10 Contributor
Durham
Posts 11,729
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher replied on Tue, Jan 15 2013 7:40 AM

Question for MikaelHansen -

Does the wall bracket actually block the bass port or does it just attempt to deflect the air downward??

Ban boring signatures!

wonderfulelectric
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 563
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

By the look of the phallic looking (laughs) wall bracket I think it will block the port partially which will definitely have a hand in tuning the bass alignment. 

wonderfulelectric
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 563
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Agree about the part on the ear height issue but even with the wooden legs all you just have to do is to stand further away from the speakers to fully appreciate the sound because the whole speaker and the drive units themselves are tilted upwards so the sound projected will eventually reach a an reach optimum height after a certain length is reached. 

BeoBoy68
Top 75 Contributor
Alsace 🇨🇵
Posts 1,247
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
BeoBoy68 replied on Tue, Jan 15 2013 1:07 PM

I have seen in real last Saturday. The wall bracket is too big and large. There is enough space for the bass port. I don't like personally this part. I prefer to wait for nice legs in aluminium from STB before buying the A9. 

Mikael
Top 500 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 179
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Mikael replied on Tue, Jan 15 2013 8:40 PM

Puncher:

Question for MikaelHansen -

Does the wall bracket actually block the bass port or does it just attempt to deflect the air downward??

I think some pictures are long overdue!

I have had second thoughts about wall mounting the A9, not because of the fear of blocking the bass port, but it just fits nicely in the corner on its legs. (Not the position on the photo)

But as you were interesseret in the port and wall backet I took a few photos. Im no audio expert, and havn't done any real testing, but I couldn't hear any difference. The wall mount is partly blocking the port, but as the pictures show, there is some space around the bracket. I can easily get my fingers behind the wall bracket inside the port. So I wouldn't really worry about that.

Beovision Eclipse gen2 (GX) w/ floorstand, Beolab 14.2, 4 speaker Shape and ATV4/Chromecast.

Beoplay A9mk4 GVA, Beosound 1 GVA, H2, H3, H8, E6, Beoplay EQ

Puncher
Top 10 Contributor
Durham
Posts 11,729
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher replied on Tue, Jan 15 2013 8:55 PM

Thanks Mikael, that's just what I wanted to see - it doesn't look like a calculated blockage of the bass port in an attempt to modify the bass response, they're just making use of the slot as a mechanical fixing method - Cheers!Yes - thumbs up

Ban boring signatures!

wonderfulelectric
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 563
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

The port width is bigger than than the distance from the port to the wall. No modification to bass alignment? I don't think so. And you have to factor in the narrowing of the port as well with the bracket inserted. 

Anyway I now officially declare that the A9 is a steal. A steal! The detail retrieval is gobsmacking and listening to it on the stands, hardwired to router with the port blocked at a suitable distance in a small room with my head smacked right at the center of the speaker, it beats the old Beosound 9000 with Beolab 8000s  combo hands down. I am comparing this with the same record I used to listen to with the old system btw. And I think a break-in period is necessary for the A9 too ? I never thought I would say this because I didn't think the break-in rule would apply to B&O but my impressions towards the A9 have definitely taken a paradigm shift from fresh out of the box up to now.   

Puncher
Top 10 Contributor
Durham
Posts 11,729
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Puncher replied on Wed, Jan 16 2013 10:42 PM

wonderfulelectric:

 No modification to bass alignment? I don't think so. And you have to factor in the narrowing of the port as well with the bracket inserted. 

As I said I don't think the narrowing of the bass port by the bracket is a calculated or relied upon port size reduction, especially given the relatively poor fit shown in the pictures. If it was intended to block the port in any measured way I would have expected it to fit the perifery of the aperture better than it appears.

Ban boring signatures!

Page 3 of 3 (91 items) < Previous 1 2 3 | RSS