Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

RL 60.2 vs RL 2000

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 1 Follower

Aaron Evans
Not Ranked
London
Posts 39
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Aaron Evans Posted: Fri, Oct 25 2013 10:29 PM

I have a pair of 60.2s which I am happy with. I am looking to move up to the 140s. I have just sen some RL 2000s for sale and was wondering what these are like ? Are they superior to the 60.2s?

tournedos
Top 10 Contributor
Finland
Posts 7,357
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Moderator
tournedos replied on Fri, Oct 25 2013 11:19 PM

They are one step down in the series, so hardly an improvement.

http://beocentral.com/beovox-rl

--mika

Aaron Evans
Not Ranked
London
Posts 39
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Thanks Mika, I will hold out for the 140s. I am in no real rush as I am happy with my 60.2s. Thanks again 

beaker
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 761
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beaker replied on Sun, Oct 27 2013 11:59 AM
Be careful when buying RL140s. They will definately have rotten woofers and they are not the easiest to refoam as they have very tight tolerances. Also unless you have a very powerful amp you will be better off with the 60.2's
Aaron Evans
Not Ranked
London
Posts 39
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Thanks for your advice I may just keep the 60.2s maybe save up for a bit and go for something else. Not sure what yet, would you have ant suggestions ?

 

Leslie
Top 25 Contributor
the Netherlands City
Posts 5,423
OFFLINE
Silver Member
Leslie replied on Tue, Oct 29 2013 10:20 PM

beaker:
Be careful when buying RL140s. They will definately have rotten woofers and they are not the easiest to refoam as they have very tight tolerances.

Just bought another pair and yes they need new foamrings....

Brengen & Ophalen

Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS