Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

What Stylus/Cartridges will fit a B&O Beogram 5500 Turntable

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 1 Follower

kapet
Not Ranked
Posts 1
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
kapet Posted: Sun, Nov 24 2013 4:58 PM

What Stylus/Cartridges will fit a B&O Beogram 5500 Turntable and what would be the best one for it ? Do the B&O cartridges just plug right in ? Also where is the best place buy one ? Any help with this would be greatly appreciated . Thanks .

SHEFFIELD
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 262
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
SHEFFIELD replied on Sun, Nov 24 2013 5:33 PM

The MMC1, 2, 3, 4 or 5.  Most replace with a SMMC4 from Soundsith in the USA

kallasr
Top 50 Contributor
Germany
Posts 2,562
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
kallasr replied on Sun, Nov 24 2013 7:33 PM
or www.schallplattennadeln.de

Ralf

Living Room: Beosystem 4, Beolab 7-2 (Center), Beolab 9 (Fronts), Beolab 8000 (Rears), no Subwoofer. Screen: Sony KD-85XH9096
Dining Room: Beosound Essence MK II with Beolab 4000 on stands, fed by Amazon Echo Show 8
Home Cinema: Beosystem 4, Beolab 7-4 (Center), Beolab 1 (Fronts), Beolab 4000 (Rears). Projector: Sony VPL-HW55
Home Office: Beosystem 3, Beolab 7-4, Beolab 5000, Screen: Sony KD-55XH9005 on Beovision 7-40 stand, ML to Beosound 9000 MK3 and Beosound 5/Beomaster 5 (1 TB SSD version)
Bedroom: Sony KD-65XH9077, Beosound Essence MK II with Beolab 6002 and Beolab 11 (all white, wall-mounted)

In storage: Beolab 5000/Beomaster 5000 (1960s). 

Jonathan
Top 75 Contributor
Melbourne, Australia
Posts 1,811
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Jonathan replied on Sun, Nov 24 2013 9:19 PM

Note that MMC1 is the best and MMC5 is the worst...

x:________________________

Søren Hammer
Top 100 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 953
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Jonathan:

Note that MMC1 is the best and MMC5 is the worst...

"worst" you say... The MMC5 is still perfectly capable and quite respectable with an effective tip mass of 0.5 milligrams and a similar low compliance, just like the upper tier range. Would put it that the MMC1 is a selected version of the MMC2, being the most capable models with nude fine line diamond tips on sapphire cantilevers while the MMC3 was a nude elliptical on thin aluminium cantilever; the MMC4 and MMC5 was ordinary elleptical - still an upgrade from the MMC20S (spec wise) which is one of the best sounding B&O cartridges in my opinion.

- Søren

Vinyl records, cassettes, open reel, valve amplifiers and film photography.

Jonathan
Top 75 Contributor
Melbourne, Australia
Posts 1,811
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Jonathan replied on Mon, Nov 25 2013 7:45 AM

Correct! The MMC1 is the best, and the MMC5 is the worst. The MMC1, 2, 3 and 4 are better than the MMC5 so this makes the MMC5 the worst

x:________________________

joeyboygolf
Top 25 Contributor
Ely, Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts 4,188
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Søren Hammer:

Jonathan:

Note that MMC1 is the best and MMC5 is the worst...

"; the MMC4 and MMC5 was ordinary elleptical - still an upgrade from the MMC20S (spec wise) which is one of the best sounding B&O cartridges in my opinion.

- Søren

The MMC5 sound inferior to MMC4, even to my aged ears. This is apparently achieved by changing the cantilever shape and a lower tip mass.

The most cost effective "new" cartridge is to buy a repaired MMC4 from Axel in Germany.

Regards Graham

Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS