Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Beogram 4002: Speed problem

rated by 0 users
This post has 6 Replies | 2 Followers

nounours18200
Not Ranked
France
Posts 12
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
nounours18200 Posted: Sat, Apr 4 2020 1:41 PM

Hi,

I currently restore an old Beogram 4002, and I have already performed the following:

  • all the electrolytic capacitors have been changed
  • the belt has been changed
  • the axis of the plater has been lubricated with a very good oil,
  • the Variable resistors have all been changed on the motherboard
  • the C10 caoacitor has been changed from 0.33µF up to 10µF has it is said on this site that this helps to fix the speed stability problem.
  • R1, R2, R8, R12, R36, R40, R87 have been changed by new Metal Film resistors

 

My problem is that the speed is too low.

Despite the VR15 (used to adjust the 33rpm) and VR14 (adjusting 45rpm) are both at their maximum, I obtain:

  • 33rpm maximum, cannot go further to achieve 33 1/3 rpm,
  • 39rpm instead of 45 rpm

 

Do you have suggestions of what I could do to fix this speed problem ?

Can it be the relay ? the motor that requires to be lubricated ?

Thank you for your reply,

 

 

Dillen
Top 10 Contributor
Copenhagen / Denmark
Posts 13,191
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
Dillen replied on Sat, Apr 4 2020 1:59 PM

Wrong belt? The standard belts sold on f.e. Ebay are typically too tight, putting a to high load on the motor.

Relays are almost always bad but typically cause instability or complete failure rather than a permanent low speed.

Do you have an AC or DC motor version deck?

"the C10 caoacitor has been changed from 0.33µF up to 10µF has it is said on this site that this helps to fix the speed stability problem."
- Where did you read this?

Martin

nounours18200
Not Ranked
France
Posts 12
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Hi Dillen,

The belt is new, it has improved the results over the previous one...

By reading the various posts related to the Beogram 4002, it appears that the speed and instability problems are very common. There are multiple causes that may explain this...

Regarding the C10 cap, I have read this on Beolover here: https://beolover.blogspot.com/2017/03/

The guy had the same pb and the capacitor change solved the issue....

I agree that the relay might be defective, it is probably the next replacement I will do.

"Do you have an AC or DC motor version deck?" --> I check and I comme back to you (I believe it is a DC motor but not sure)

As there are various possible causes, I try to get advices...

 

sonavor
Top 25 Contributor
Texas, United States
Posts 3,732
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
sonavor replied on Sat, Apr 4 2020 7:42 PM

Hi,

The C10 capacitor swap was a final fine tuning of the platter motor speed stability after a rebuild of the DC platter motor where the two bearings are re-infused with oil and, if necessary, new snubber diodes are replaced on the motor. After that Beolover did a long term (24 hour) speed stability test. He determined in that case the 10uF performed better than the original 0.47uF (in his case). You have missed two important restoration steps - rebuilding the platter motor (the most likely cause of your speed instability) and replacing the speed select relay (another problem source).  The order to restore these are motor rebuild first followed by changing the speed relay and recapping the control board. I also like to replace the two speed adjustment trimmers to multi-turn type trimmers but that is optional. As I said earlier, the motor is the most likely problem and will start to misbehave before you start hearing it squeaking. After all it is over forty years old on the original oil-infused bearings.

-sonavor

sonavor
Top 25 Contributor
Texas, United States
Posts 3,732
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
sonavor replied on Sat, Apr 4 2020 10:13 PM

One other thing about the C10 capacitor...
It is interesting that the Beogram 4002 and 4004 service manual schematics both call out 0.33uF for the C10 capacitor but we have seen units with 0.33uF, 0.47uF and 10uF capacitors. So it is something B&O changed based on some sort of testing or evaluation that I have never found any documentation for. I would recommend keeping your original value of C10 until you can test out that one of the other values performs better (by plotting the speed stability over a long period of time the way Beolover did). Also, the change in C10 for his example got rid of some occasional spikes in the speed that were too short and too infrequent to have been noticeable by human hearing. The C10 capacitor by itself would not be contributing to your slow speed issue.

-sonavor

sonavor
Top 25 Contributor
Texas, United States
Posts 3,732
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
sonavor replied on Sat, Apr 4 2020 10:23 PM

Something else bothers me about your speed issue. Are both your 1R14 and 1R15 speed adjustment pots maxed out (for 33 1/2 RPM and 45 RPM)?
If that is the case are you certain you replaced the them with 5KOhm trimmers?  What about the 2R1 and 2R2 trimmers?  What position are they in?

-sonavor

Søren Mexico
Top 10 Contributor
Mexico City
Posts 6,411
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

nounours18200:
The belt is new, it has improved the results over the previous one...

Where did you buy your belt ?

Collecting Vintage B&O is not a hobby, its a lifestyle.

Page 1 of 1 (7 items) | RSS