Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Beolab 3 vs. Beolab 8000 vs. Beolab 17 - for TV and Music ?

rated by 0 users
This post has 11 Replies | 1 Follower

didole
Not Ranked
Posts 45
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
didole Posted: Sat, Dec 24 2016 7:25 AM

All,

finally one of my >16 year old Beolab 6000 has died and is giving me an excuse to go buy new speakers! Now the question is of course: Which ones?

The speakers will be connected to a BeoVision V1 40 as the only speakers. I am using them to watch movies, but also to listen to music (through AppleTV connected to the TV). The room is about 4x6 meters big.

Right now I can get used speakers in good condition on eBay for about 800€ (Beolab 8000), 1100€ (Beolab 3), or 1800€ (Beolab 17). Which ones would you say have the best sound, especially for music (for TV I was happy with my Beolab 6000 actually) ?

Thanks a LOT in advance for any advice,

Christof

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Sat, Dec 24 2016 8:26 AM
didole:

Right now I can get used speakers in good condition on eBay for about 800€ (Beolab 8000), 1100€ (Beolab 3), or 1800€ (Beolab 17). Which ones would you say have the best sound, especially for music (for TV I was happy with my Beolab 6000 actually) ?

If the BL17s are affordable why not buy the BL8Ks as fronts and the BL3s as rears and ho surround sound (I presumed the V1 supports 5.1 -- if not perhaps the BL17 are the best as they are the most up to date and likely to last longest ?)

BeoNut since '75

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

BeoLab 17!

But you will surely find advocates for the others too :-)

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

didole
Not Ranked
Posts 45
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
didole replied on Sat, Dec 24 2016 10:51 AM

elephant:
didole:

 

Right now I can get used speakers in good condition on eBay for about 800€ (Beolab 8000), 1100€ (Beolab 3), or 1800€ (Beolab 17). Which ones would you say have the best sound, especially for music (for TV I was happy with my Beolab 6000 actually) ?

 

 

If the BL17s are affordable why not buy the BL8Ks as fronts and the BL3s as rears and ho surround sound (I presumed the V1 supports 5.1 -- if not perhaps the BL17 are the best as they are the most up to date and likely to last longest ?)

Thanks for the suggestion, but no surround for me, too much cabling involved...

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Sat, Dec 24 2016 11:10 AM
didole:

Thanks for the suggestion, but no surround for me, too much cabling involved...

Then the BL17s have the advantage of supporting wireless....although some would say that is a disadvantage!

And to get the wireless going you'd need a transmitter (but not receiver(s))

BeoNut since '75

The Beonic Man
Top 150 Contributor
Bristol
Posts 812
OFFLINE
Gold Member

The Lab 3s would be my choice. They are an incredible speaker and often underestimated in terms of their performance I think. Truth is you're not going to make a bad decision whichever way you go when it comes to speakers and B&O. This is their forte and where they excel. Simon.

B&O products are V1-32, BS2, H95, E8 and an Essence remote.
11-46 now replaced with Sony A90J 65”, Sony HT-A9, Sony UBP-X800M2 and Sony SRS-NS7.

 

didole
Not Ranked
Posts 45
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
didole replied on Sat, Dec 24 2016 12:28 PM

BAND'OH!:

The Lab 3s would be my choice. They are an incredible speaker and often underestimated in terms of their performance I think. Truth is you're not going to make a bad decision whichever way you go when it comes to speakers and B&O. This is their forte and where they excel. Simon.

Yep, this is my point of view also. I am sure all 3 are good choices. But on the other hand, I still want to make sure that I get the best ones in that price range...

Manbearpig
Top 100 Contributor
Posts 908
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

I haven't heard the 17s but there's not much between 8000s and 3s I'd say. But 3s probably have a slight advantage in terms of flexibility. They can easily be combined with a Beolab 11 and then are probably the better combination than 8000 + 11. They are also great in a surround setup. If the design pleases you, I'd pick the 3s over the 8000s. Soundwise, I'd say it's the better option; not by much, but significantly so.

BeoGreg
Top 75 Contributor
South of France
Posts 1,417
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
BeoGreg replied on Sat, Dec 24 2016 1:47 PM
Beolab 17 all the way for me.

Each time I ear those speakers I can't believe how good they are.

Second choice Beolab 3, the lens does a great job for music (if you don't like heavy bass).

didole
Not Ranked
Posts 45
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
didole replied on Mon, Dec 26 2016 9:09 PM

BeoGreg:
Beolab 17 all the way for me.

 

Each time I ear those speakers I can't believe how good they are.

 

Second choice Beolab 3, the lens does a great job for music (if you don't like heavy bass).

 

 

So you'd say that 17 has better bass than 3, which in turn has better bass than 8000 ?

BeoGreg
Top 75 Contributor
South of France
Posts 1,417
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
BeoGreg replied on Mon, Dec 26 2016 9:47 PM
Oh yes.

I have 8000's, I had a few times 3's at home for some tests (great for the size) but the next one would be the 17's (or 18's but purely aestheticaly).

The 17's are the best bang for the bucks I think.
didole
Not Ranked
Posts 45
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
didole replied on Tue, Dec 27 2016 5:03 PM

BeoGreg:
Oh yes.

 

I have 8000's, I had a few times 3's at home for some tests (great for the size) but the next one would be the 17's (or 18's but purely aestheticaly).

 

The 17's are the best bang for the bucks I think.

For sure I would take the 18s over the 17s also - but 4K is definitely more than I am ready to spend for a pair of used speakers... So I guess I have to shoot for 17s! Thanks for your help, community!!!

Page 1 of 1 (12 items) | RSS