Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Bv11 or keep Bv7-40 MK3

rated by 0 users
This post has 38 Replies | 2 Followers

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader Posted: Sun, Dec 1 2013 5:55 PM
Hi

B&o are offering £1300 against bv11 46" and wondering what you guys advise I also have a cinema setup with a third party projector using speaker roles and enjoy watching

Should I upgrade?
Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

No, why?

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Yes. The picture on the 7-40 mk3 is very much a first generation full HD picture, very dark with little detail.

When I upgraded from the 7 to the 10 it was a significant pictorial upgrade. The 11 in most ways, not all, is better again. The speakers and their modes etc, compared to the 10 are a large upgrade. I know you have speakers etc, but most of the time as a standalone TV it's very good.

The Spotify and YouTube integration is a clever and useful smart TV upgrade.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

SHEFFIELD
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 262
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Hi Quader,

Are you using the 7-40 system 3 to drive the projector using your existing speakers?

Nick

9 LEE
Top 10 Contributor
Eastbourne, UK
Posts 7,218
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
9 LEE replied on Sun, Dec 1 2013 8:00 PM

Yes, I'd upgrade in a heartbeat if funds permitted!

I have to say the 7-40 Mk3, even by the very latest standards, is a superb TV - but the BV11 is right at the cutting edge...

Lee

Seanie_230
Top 50 Contributor
UK
Posts 2,278
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Hi there

if you are like me and running your Beemer from the BV7 then my moving to the new TV you will loose the second output to the Beemer.

This is the reason I have not upgraded my tv and that I am stuck between a rock and a hard place.

bv7 mk6 will allow us to keep the 2nd output and I believe that the beosystem 4 is not yet capable of doing it but should be in the future.

 

Hope this helps

Eclipse 65
V1-32
Beosound M5
Essence MK2
BLI

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Sun, Dec 1 2013 9:10 PM

Hi Seanie

i got the impression i could connect all my present setup  onto the bv11 as there appears to be lot of connections  on thr bv11 

i too have an optoma hd65 

 

SHEFFIELD
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 262
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

If you drive the projector etc via your 7-40, then you won't be able to do this via BV11

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

My short answer was "No", because you said that you use the (BSys3 of the) BV740 MK3  as a center for your cinema setup.

I agree with Chris that the BV11 is superieur to the BV7 in most ways, but you would loose exactly that function as things are now.

Would be wise to wait untill the 'promised' cinema solution for the BSys4 has arrived. Maybe new constallations will be possible then - or perhaps with the awaited new BV coming next year?

I am sure there will be good offers later as well for those who want to upgrade.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Sun, Dec 1 2013 10:00 PM

quader:

B&o are offering £1300 against bv11 46" and wondering what you guys advise I also have a cinema setup with a third party projector using speaker roles and enjoy watching

Should I upgrade?

I owned a MK3 and then a MK4. The MK3 is quite old now. My MK4 was a significant picture upgrade and the BV11-46, an even bigger jump. You'd notice a huge difference and, let's face it, your TV experience is primarily about the picture quality, first and foremost.

Obviously the projector issue is a significant reason why you couldn't switch to a BV11, though. Have you considered a BV7-55 MK2? You get a top notch picture, projector support and it shouldn't be much more than upgrading to the BV11.

One word of advice though - sell the BV7 privately, trade in any working a TV you can find to get the £1300!! 

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Can't you run a projector from a PS3?

Moxxey is correct about the 7-55, still the best TV available and some of the Mk1 versions are quite a bargain at the moment.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

A 'cinema solution' was promised for the BSys4 "by the end of the year".

If this includes the BV11 as well, I don't know.

Maybe it is time to start asking the dealers for this - when, how and how much?

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

The hardware is available now from Atlona. The SW is what we are waiting on atm. 

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

@BeoMegaMan

Could you be a bit more specific about the 'Atlona hardware'?

Will it be a BSys4-only solution?

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

It will work off the AT-HD-IR series and the AT-HD-RSNET. I don't believe there is a B&O only version for the solution. 

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Thanks.

"Will it be a BSys4-only solution?" means - will this solution work for a BV11, or only for the 'standalone new engine' BeoSystem 4?

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

One would believe it's only for the BS4 ATM seeing as the 11's don't have a HDMI out. Weather or not that will change in the future I'm not told ATM. 

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

You will have to get the video signal out of the BSys4 to distribute it to the projector - but how?

How do you connect these  - I see no HDMI-out on the BSys4.

MM

 

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

There is a single HDMI out on the BS4. Apparently, there is another splitter box that hasn't been announced yet that will allow you to do two screens at once. 

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Mon, Dec 2 2013 6:47 PM

i dont know whether you can through a PS3

i know with my present setup i can watch sky channels on the projector as well as blue ray via ps3

SHEFFIELD
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 262
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Are you driving the projector from the TV via the cinema control?

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Mon, Dec 2 2013 8:56 PM
Mk3 has 2 output options
Marco6474
Not Ranked
Posts 54
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Hi,

I received my BV 11-55 last week but kept my old BV 7-40 mk3 for my bedroom. I'd just like to say GO for it! 

The picture is so great and can't be compared (and even the sound). There are so many HDMI inputs and possibilities that you'll find a way to use a projector, should you still want to use it...

I'd just advise to get a MK2 rather than a discounted MK1 for the wireless capability. It offers such flexibility. With the speaker group options, you may even use it like we did with the former Masterlink.

Hope that helps, Marc.

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Mon, Dec 2 2013 10:12 PM
I am tempted Bv11 -55 is too big for my room and Hence I invested into a HD projector

There is not a solution to use both unless someone out there has a solution
Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Oddly enough I was speaking to someone tonight who has just replaced his 7-40 Mk 6, with an 11-55.

Much of what he watched on DVD SD, was of a better quality on the 7-40 Mk 6 than his new 11. He has speakers so the audio side is largely irrelevant.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Mon, Dec 2 2013 11:18 PM

Chris Townsend:
Oddly enough I was speaking to someone tonight who has just replaced his 7-40 Mk 6, with an 11-55.

Much of what he watched on DVD SD, was of a better quality on the 7-40 Mk 6 than his new 11. He has speakers so the audio side is largely irrelevant.

Always been that way. SD is filmed with only 576 lines (480 for NTSC), so pixels are doubled on a 1080p panel. The larger the panel, the more obvious are the flaws the the original recording. So on a 55", SD will look terrible. It looks poor on my BV11-46, but fine on my BV10-32. I barely see much difference between SD and HD on the 32", due to the size of the pixels on the small panel. HD is marginally sharper.

Why do you think they recommend 4K for 55" or higher? :)

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

It's all so blindingly obvious now my world isn't in a Rose induced cloudErm..

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

TerryM
Not Ranked
Posts 66
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
TerryM replied on Tue, Dec 3 2013 4:58 PM

moxxey:

Chris Townsend:
Oddly enough I was speaking to someone tonight who has just replaced his 7-40 Mk 6, with an 11-55.

Much of what he watched on DVD SD, was of a better quality on the 7-40 Mk 6 than his new 11. He has speakers so the audio side is largely irrelevant.

Always been that way. SD is filmed with only 576 lines (480 for NTSC), so pixels are doubled on a 1080p panel. The larger the panel, the more obvious are the flaws the the original recording. So on a 55", SD will look terrible. It looks poor on my BV11-46, but fine on my BV10-32. I barely see much difference between SD and HD on the 32", due to the size of the pixels on the small panel. HD is marginally sharper.

Why do you think they recommend 4K for 55" or higher? :)

I have to disagree about SD necessarily looking terrible on a 55".

The quality of the processing will have an important bearing on the quality of the displayed image.

SD, be it Freeview, or DVD, was excellent on my Pioneer 60" TV, and is superb on my BV 7-55 Mk 2.

As for 4K, the reviews of currently released TVs are revealing them to have issues re non 4K PQ.

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Tue, Dec 3 2013 5:57 PM
How much is the Bv11 -55?
badgersurf
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 539
OFFLINE
Gold Member

Does the BV11 upscale pictures and sound from a DVD?

SHEFFIELD
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 262
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

I've sent you a pm....such a good deal that I daren't broadcast it!

And in stock....

Mark
Top 100 Contributor
London
Posts 1,063
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Mark replied on Tue, Dec 3 2013 9:11 PM
I don't want to detract from the quality of this good discussion but age has to play a factor with enjoying great picture quality. There has to be an optimum age of a person where they can view or hear at the highest level.

I aspire to own the newest and best but question if I would really get all the benefits apart from knowing I have purchased the best.

we tend to forget there is more to design than designing.

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Tue, Dec 3 2013 9:57 PM

TerryM:

SD, be it Freeview, or DVD, was excellent on my Pioneer 60" TV, and is superb on my BV 7-55 Mk 2.

Normally SD is better on a plasma as it smooths the picture. An LCD is far more 'brutal' with the source, so any flaws are exaggerated.

It stands to reason that SD isn't great on a large LCD screen as it has to be both upscaled and you see the flaws in the recording. It's true that some modern well-produced SD still looks good on a large LCD panel (as an example, a recent movie), but older SD or SD through a low bandwidth channel, doesn't look good, as the source isn't good to start with. You can see quite clear and obvious differences between even high bandwidth SD content and the same channel in HD.

There's simply no way a 576-lined SD image is going to be 'superb'. I can't think of any SD content on a BV11-46 (only slightly being a 55-MK2 in picture quality) or my BV7-40, that I'd regard as superb. There's a reason that 1080p Blu-ray looks so good on a 55" panel, and it's not down to picture processing. That's more of a dream B&O owners like to tell other people to justify their purchase, IMHO. Note the last word there.

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Wed, Dec 4 2013 6:09 PM

for sure HD content is so much better than SD, must look good on the BV11 if it is better than

BV7 Mk3 , i enjoy watching HD content either through Sky or PS3 and very rarely use

the built in DVD player for that reason.

4K is suppose to be even better than HD but i think we are still few years off when more content

is available in 4K

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

The software for the dual screen experience on the BeoSystem 4 is now available from B&O. You will need specialty Atlona pieces as well as having to contact B&O to have them specifically send you the update to your BeoSystem 4. Apparently it's not a SW that will be rolled out to every machine. All those holding out for dual screen contact your dealer now!!

3rd party products -> HDMI Matrix/Exp./Ext. -> Atlona HDMI Switch/Expander- AT-HD4-V42-B&O

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

@BeoMegaMan

why not make a seperate post about this awaited sw-update?

I saw your posting only 'by accident'.

Might interest more BeoWorlders.

MM

There is a tv - and there is a BV

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Your right.... I was just trying to keep it in the context of the question. I'll make another post specific to the announcement. 

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

quader
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 109
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
quader replied on Fri, Dec 13 2013 1:35 PM

To add beosystem 4 and other accessories all seem to much of an expense

Shame that B&O have not thought of this

 

 

BeoMegaMan
Top 150 Contributor
Posts 601
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
I think B&O did think it through. Would you rather buy a Beosystem 4 with everything baked in and pay twice the price? Or buy a basic model for half the price then add the features as you need them or desire? Something like 1-5% actually use the dual screen setup, so should we all have to fork out for those few to take advantage? Also, those parts are from Atlona not B&O so you have the potential to shop around or come across a deal/bargain. Jmho :)

Ah, you know... A little B&O here, a little there 

Page 1 of 1 (39 items) | RSS