Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Newish TV... weel for me anyway.

rated by 0 users
This post has 17 Replies | 1 Follower

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife Posted: Fri, Dec 20 2013 12:32 PM

Hi all,

Has been a while since I last visited....new website site since then.

I have been thinking again about a newish TV for what we call the playroom. I currently have a panasonic plasma that was connected to a Beosystem 2 but that has since departed & have just been using it stand alone with a Zektor component switcher with Sky, Wii, Apple TV etc The DVD & amp duties were handled by a Linn Classik Movie 05 which is very good 

I also have a RF Avant in what we call the adults room but since the link setup has gone it aslo has been used standalone. 

I would like to perhaps kill two birds with one stone so to speak in that update the Playroom TV & reinstate the link system

My options are  as follows fro trawling various sites for deals.

BV 7-40 MK2 with moto stand & 7.1 speaker at around £1500... I could use the stand & speaker later when I update the avant perhaps

BV 7-40 MK3 screen only at around £1500-2000... I have a pair of Beolab 3000 that I could use for L & R.

Beoplay V1 40 at around £1700

Beosystem 3 at around £2000

I do really like the 7-40 & did see compare the MK2 & the MK3 a few years ago & thought they were not too far apart.

I know the MK3 has the Beosystem 3 etc but I could add the HDMI expander to a mark 2 for not too much money.

If I could perhaps get a MK2 screen on its own I would perhaps go for that for the moment as its the least outlay & I could then use later to replace the avant.

What do you think?

 

Simon

 

 

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
There is a Beovision 9 on Ebay at the moment for £1500!

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Fri, Dec 20 2013 1:48 PM

Was it But it now?

 As it may have gone already!

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Already gone I think.

I would go for a mk3 7-40 any day over a mk2. HDMI slots and Beosystem 3.

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Fri, Dec 20 2013 2:29 PM

beolife:

I do really like the 7-40 & did see compare the MK2 & the MK3 a few years ago & thought they were not too far apart.

What do you think?

Personally, having owned a BV7-40 MKIII (and then a MKIV), I wouldn't get a MKIII. It's quite old now, in LCD panel terms. The picture was ridicuously dark in places, on certain movies. Made dark movies hard to watch. The MKIV was a surprisingly huge panel improvement. My first MKIV BV7 broken down, 8 months after purchasing, B&O gave me a brand new MKIV and it was an improvement again. In those days, even 6 months between TVs resulted in big panel improvements. Less so over the last couple of years (for regular LCD). I'd only go for a MKIV or higher (I think the last revision was MKVI).

There were other advantages with the MKIV. You got an additional HDMI socket, in some cases, an internal Blu-ray player and a Freeview HD module!

I would recommend a BV7 though, for the audio experience. Just try and get a MKIV, even if it pushes up the budget by a few hundred pounds.

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Fri, Dec 20 2013 3:05 PM

Yes a MK4 or `MK5 would be the best option but as I am only looking for screen only they will be hard to come by for reasonable money.

Does the Beosystem 3 handle multichannel PCM?

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 1:49 PM

Been offered a late 2007  MK2 serial starting 2040.....in black with free view module & Beo4 for £800 & a wall mount 

I dont really need the freeview but have been told worth something to sell on.

Does this sound Ok

olvisab
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,391
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
olvisab replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 1:58 PM

The mk3 is a minimum.

Big difference with a mk2.

The mk4 is maybe better for HD content but for a mix of HD and non HD, the mk3 is far better.

I own led tv too and I must say that the non hd program are worst on it.

 

4 beolab 5,  beolab 9, beolab 10, beolab 5000, beolab 8000 mk2, beolab 6002, beolab 3500, beovision 7 55 mk2,  2 beovision 11 46 mk4, beotime, beosound ouverture, beosound essence, beoplay A8, beomaster 900 RG de luxe and the collection continues...

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 2:25 PM

Yes I would really like a MK3 but screen only for the additional HDMI & flexibility but they are hard to come by & they are a lot more money around £2000 ish. Plus I do not think the picture quality was that much better on a MK3 as the panel was the limiting factor, its just a higher resolution & a slight uplift in the contrast ratio.

The difference between a MKI & a MKII is bigger as the panel was far superior.

The Beosystem 3 could not make the panel any better on the MKIII, if you put a the BS3 on the MK2 panel I would think they would have similar picture quality. 

I think they only really got better with later MK IV when the LCD panel improved a lot more.

My current Plasma a Panasonic 4 series vintage from 2002 has a great picture when fed with HD and it's only 480 resolution!

I think I will go for the MKII as if you take into account the other bits it not a bad deal just would have preferred it to be less!!

How much would the Freeview module be worth out of interest?

olvisab
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,391
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
olvisab replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 5:29 PM

I had a beovision 5 and the picture was great too.

I had a mk2 before the mk3 (updated to the last software !) and I won't go back even if someone gives me one. I will refuse it.

The most important thing is that you agree with yourself and happy with your purchase.

4 beolab 5,  beolab 9, beolab 10, beolab 5000, beolab 8000 mk2, beolab 6002, beolab 3500, beovision 7 55 mk2,  2 beovision 11 46 mk4, beotime, beosound ouverture, beosound essence, beoplay A8, beomaster 900 RG de luxe and the collection continues...

9 LEE
Top 10 Contributor
Eastbourne, UK
Posts 7,218
OFFLINE
Founder
Moderator
9 LEE replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 6:59 PM

I think you're missing a trick with the V1-40. Incredible value for money and a great TV with great sound and an incredibly good picture.

Lee

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Sat, Dec 21 2013 11:52 PM

beolife:

The Beosystem 3 could not make the panel any better on the MKIII, if you put a the BS3 on the MK2 panel I would think they would have similar picture quality. 

No idea why, but this 'Beosystem 3 is the difference' argument has been on this forum for many years, for a reason I can't quite comprehend. Without getting personal with anyone, I'm sure it's a lack of technical knowledge where people assumed 'ok, the BS3 is £5K, so it must be awesome!". 

The difference between the MK2 and MK3 isn't the BS3. It's the 1080P panel. The MK2 was way better - at the time - for SD content, as it didn't need to upscale. When the MK3 was first released, with it's relatively early 1080P panel, HD was at a premium, so suddenly content looked blocky when upscaled. MK2 pictures, again at the time, looked better, so the MK3 looked inferior.

As most content is now sourced and presented in HD, the MK3 is definitely the minimum BV7-40 anyone should go for. It's quite old. I'm sure I had a MK3 in 2007. That's six years and six years is a hell of a long time in panel production. I'd seriously save up and go for a MK4, particularly if you were planning on keeping the TV for a few years.

olvisab
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,391
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
olvisab replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 1:49 AM

moxxey:
The difference between the MK2 and MK3 isn't the BS3. It's the 1080P panel.

We can discuss it in every way but 720p to 1080p is a huge improvment.

A bad panel is bad even with SD. That's why I far prefer a good beovision 5 than a bv 7 mk2.

moxxey:
I'd seriously save up

It is nearly twice the price of a mk3.

4 beolab 5,  beolab 9, beolab 10, beolab 5000, beolab 8000 mk2, beolab 6002, beolab 3500, beovision 7 55 mk2,  2 beovision 11 46 mk4, beotime, beosound ouverture, beosound essence, beoplay A8, beomaster 900 RG de luxe and the collection continues...

Mark
Top 100 Contributor
London
Posts 1,063
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Mark replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 6:53 PM
Personally I don't like the TV being the focal point of the room so opted for a 32", but is the 40" the same physical dimensions as a 32" just with a smaller black border/frame ?

we tend to forget there is more to design than designing.

moxxey
Top 25 Contributor
South West, UK
Posts 5,359
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
moxxey replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 8:08 PM

olvisab:

We can discuss it in every way but 720p to 1080p is a huge improvment.

Not when the MK3 was launched. There was very little HD, so SD was upscaled to the 1080P panel, so most TV channels suddenly looked like a downgrade compared to the MK2. And my quote was referring to the launch, not the MK3 in 2013.

olvisab:

It is nearly twice the price of a mk3.

On Lifestyles website, a MKIV is only £500 more http://www.lifestyle-av.co.uk/product_list.asp?sectionId=1

Based on my MK3 and MK4 experience, this is £500 worth spending.

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 10:17 PM

If I was looking to spend £3000 on a MK3 TV & the MK4 is only £500 more I would either haggle a bit harder for the MK4 or stump the extra cash. Unfortunately I am not in a position to drop an extra £2500-£3000 on a TV at the moment & if I was then i would definitely get the MK4 or better.

I have got my MK2 now & I must say fed with a HD signal it is pretty good. it has only got 147 days on it!

Unfortunately I have a couple of issues, I am unable to get control of the Sky box fully. The D-pad is working as are the coloured buttons but not the numbers, it's not sending to the IR emitter. I have tried different ports & emitters but it cannot be that other the other functions would not work. Any ideas?

Plus I am unable to get the apple TV sound working, I currently have it set up as DVD2 on AV2 input, Audio on A2 via a QED Toslink to Coaxial  convertor & C2 for control although bizarrely there is no ATV in the PUC list but there is NOW TV!

If I select DVD2 it changes to the ATV but the sound is carried over from the Sky on V.AUX which is all on inputs 1 i.e. AV1, A1 & C1

I would like to turn off both the tuners but am unsure if it is possible on this model as I would like to use the TV & DTV buttons for Sky etc.

I have also had to set up my Beolab 3000 as 4000's & connect both of them to the centre channel as your not able to select just a front pair.

The software is 7.91 & I am also able to select the HDMI expander.

Any thoughts would welcome.

 

Thanks

 

 

beolife
Not Ranked
Posts 10
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
beolife replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 10:17 PM

Duplicate post 

 

 

olvisab
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,391
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
olvisab replied on Sun, Dec 22 2013 10:41 PM

moxxey:
And my quote was referring to the launch, not the MK3 in 2013.

Sorry I thought you just compare them today.

moxxey:
On Lifestyles website, a MKIV is only £500 more http://www.lifestyle-av.co.uk/product_list.asp?sectionId=1

But Lee offer for the mk3 is 800 pounds above what you can find in private sales.

If it was really a question of 500 pounds , then you are absolutely right.

4 beolab 5,  beolab 9, beolab 10, beolab 5000, beolab 8000 mk2, beolab 6002, beolab 3500, beovision 7 55 mk2,  2 beovision 11 46 mk4, beotime, beosound ouverture, beosound essence, beoplay A8, beomaster 900 RG de luxe and the collection continues...

Page 1 of 1 (18 items) | RSS