Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

Band and Olufsen sued

rated by 0 users
This post has 15 Replies | 3 Followers

Chris Townsend
Top 50 Contributor
Qatar
Posts 3,531
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Chris Townsend Posted: Fri, May 15 2015 4:12 PM
Check out this nonsense....

http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/blog/techflash/2015/05/worcester-company-sues-bang-olufsen-over-headphone.html

Beosound Stage, Beovision 8-40, Beolit 20, Beosound Explore.

Dave Farr
Top 50 Contributor
France
Posts 2,283
OFFLINE
Gold Member
Dave Farr replied on Fri, May 15 2015 4:22 PM

So the only actual similarity is the colour! Bonkers, and should be thrown out immediately. They look completely different so the only similarity is the colour. I suspect it's a way of advertising and has no actual merit. I'm sure any headphone maker could sue any other maker due to actual physical similarity except it's now generic - how else can you make headphones? A pathetic move by David Clark Co. I think I may write and tell them so.

If anyone wants to do the same, email:

serviceWWW@DavidClark.com

Dave.

Duels
Top 50 Contributor
England
Posts 2,553
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Duels replied on Fri, May 15 2015 4:23 PM
If they actually looked the same I'd understand more. But you (surely?) can't protect the colour pale green!!!
Mark
Top 100 Contributor
London
Posts 1,063
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Mark replied on Fri, May 15 2015 4:36 PM
so for a $400 filling fee Dave Clark has plenty of free advertising ....

this annoys me like those companies who buy up patents then go around suing manufactures...

hopefully the judge will recommend he gets out more..

we tend to forget there is more to design than designing.

Dave Farr
Top 50 Contributor
France
Posts 2,283
OFFLINE
Gold Member
Dave Farr replied on Fri, May 15 2015 5:03 PM

Mark:
so for a $400 filling fee Dave Clark has plenty of free advertising ....

 

 

this annoys me like those companies who buy up patents then go around suing manufactures...

 

 

hopefully the judge will recommend he gets out more..

Pretty well what I said in an e-mail to the David Clark Company.  An almost free publicity stunt.  I don't suppose I'll get a reply or if I do it will be along the lines of 'we take our products and innovation seriously and will pursue anyone who infringes our trademark of the colour green' etc etc.

Dave.

 

Wouter
Top 500 Contributor
Netherlands
Posts 302
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Wouter replied on Fri, May 15 2015 5:29 PM
Boy oh boy we should be worried, we've got a chair in that colour!

Wouter

Paul W
Top 75 Contributor
London
Posts 1,810
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Paul W replied on Fri, May 15 2015 6:29 PM

That's insane, bonkers even!!! What's next? Every car manufacturer suing each other for making hatchback cars all look the same!

I believe I read that Tiffany patented the Pantone reference colour of their minty green blue :) All bizarre!

Sal
Top 75 Contributor
California, USA
Posts 1,197
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Sal replied on Fri, May 15 2015 7:09 PM

IANAL but frivolous lawsuits should carry with them mandatory punitive damages. Maybe get B&O some more money for having to deal with this insanity.

Simonbeo
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,451
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Simonbeo replied on Fri, May 15 2015 7:10 PM

Their headphone design doesn't look very good does it ? Perhaps they sound good instead but even the arms holding the speaker differ from the office-chair mono-arm of the B&O that " copied" it.

 

Beo Century ,Beoplay V1, Beocenter 6, Ex-Beolit 12, Beotime , A8. Beolit 15 , Form 2i , Beolab 2000, Beoplay A3.Beosound 1

Jeff
Top 25 Contributor
USA
Posts 3,793
OFFLINE
Silver Member
Jeff replied on Fri, May 15 2015 8:24 PM

Sounds more like something Bose would do...Bose, better sound through litigation.

Jeff

I'm afraid I'm recovering from the BeoVirus. Sad

riverstyx
Top 100 Contributor
SouthWest UK
Posts 938
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
riverstyx replied on Fri, May 15 2015 10:45 PM

but you've gotta feel sorry for David Clark co. - it seems like almost every headphone manufacturer has copied 'their colour'...

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=headphones&tbm=isch&tbs=ic:specific,isc:teal

Erm..

 

Simonbeo
Top 75 Contributor
Posts 1,451
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

This is plagurism in colour and form . Or do I not understand ?

Beo Century ,Beoplay V1, Beocenter 6, Ex-Beolit 12, Beotime , A8. Beolit 15 , Form 2i , Beolab 2000, Beoplay A3.Beosound 1

riverstyx
Top 100 Contributor
SouthWest UK
Posts 938
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
riverstyx replied on Fri, May 15 2015 10:54 PM

I reckon these could be next on the litigation list:

Evan
Top 50 Contributor
USA
Posts 3,621
OFFLINE
Gold Member
Evan replied on Fri, May 15 2015 11:44 PM

As I was opening the link, I thought to myself that the conflict must be technical, perhaps patent related for noise control etc. Oh how I laughed when I read it was about the H2 and its color!

If the pale green is a popular color, DC better watch their backs.. Another Danish company will pull seniority when it comes to the color's use.

Beo4 'til I die!

Aussie Michael
Top 25 Contributor
Melbourne, AU
Posts 3,730
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

Interesting because unlike in the movie The Devil Wears Prada when they were holding up the 2 cerulean belts ... 

I hate that we live in such a litigious society.  

MediaBobNY
Top 75 Contributor
Greenwich Village, NYC
Posts 1,106
OFFLINE
Bronze Member

B&O could certainly play that game - e.g. just saw this a couple of days ago.  In person it looks like a fat beosound 3.

Page 1 of 1 (16 items) | RSS