Sign in   |  Join   |  Help
Untitled Page

ARCHIVED FORUM -- March 2012 to February 2022
READ ONLY FORUM

This is the second Archived Forum which was active between 1st March 2012 and 23rd February 2022

 

BeoPlay V1 and IWS ?

rated by 0 users
This post has 5 Replies | 0 Followers

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member
Millemissen Posted: Wed, Nov 13 2013 11:25 PM

Does anyone know if the V1's are getting the IWS module update?

Greetings Millemissen

There is a tv - and there is a BV

MartinW
Top 200 Contributor
Posts 389
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
MartinW replied on Wed, Nov 13 2013 11:37 PM
Hi MM,

Its a definite no - but the IWS transmitter can be used to get the same effect.

I am sure this will be down to the production cost vs selling price of the V1. They won't want to push the price up on a feature that probably won't be widely used on this TV.
Mikael
Top 500 Contributor
Denmark
Posts 179
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
Mikael replied on Thu, Nov 14 2013 12:44 AM

Does the Beovision 11 use an external wifi antenna just like the V1?
I can't remember if the 11 is totally enclosed in metal like the V1.

I suspect that it isn't possible to install the IWS module in the V1 due to the metal enclosure. But if it is and if it finds it's way to the V1, then it will most likely be an optional extra just like the S2-tuner/web media etc. Just like MartinW said, it's massively important to keep the base cost of the V1 down.

Beovision Eclipse gen2 (GX) w/ floorstand, Beolab 14.2, 4 speaker Shape and ATV4/Chromecast.

Beoplay A9mk4 GVA, Beosound 1 GVA, H2, H3, H8, E6, Beoplay EQ

Millemissen
Top 10 Contributor
Flensborg, Denmark
Posts 14,680
OFFLINE
Gold Member

 

 

It might be that it is difficult with a built-in module - because of the steel of the V1.

As for rhe argument that one could use the external transmitter with "the same effect", I am not quite sure.

As long as we don't know how the signalpath - with the in-built module - is, we can't know.

If the path is 'all digital', I would prefer the in-built!

For the external transmitter you must (with BV's) use PowerLink, which - as we know - is analog.

Means: first convert from digital to analog and then - in the external transmitter - convert to digital for the wireless transmission.

My insight in sound/soundquality tells me that one should not do too much DA-AD converting/samplerate up/downmixing.

If you - and/ or I - can hear this is a different story!

As for the costs: if I am willing to pay for the BeoLab Transmitter 1, why shouldn't I be willing to pay for the extra costs of an in-built transmitter in a V1.

Only reason I can see, would be that they probably would have to have 2 versions of the V1,  which - I must admit - is not likely to happen.

On the orher hand - a built-in transmitter would be a trigger for selling the new speakers too.

 

Anyway, I can live with it - just wanted to know if anybody had informations on this.

P.S. Why the 1 behind the BeoLab Transmitter?

Will there be a 2 as well?

 

Greetings Millemissen

 

 

There is a tv - and there is a BV

elephant
Top 10 Contributor
AU
Posts 8,219
OFFLINE
Founder
elephant replied on Thu, Nov 14 2013 8:12 PM
Millemissen:

P.S. Why the 1 behind the BeoLab Transmitter?

Will there be a 2 as well?

Greetings Millemissen

There is a tv - and there is a BV.

Don't get your hopes up !

I used to be excited that I had BeoLink Wireless 1

Of course the BeoLink has more functions than BeoLab ... and vice versa = it's a Venn diagram !

BeoNut since '75

rednik
Top 500 Contributor
Posts 182
OFFLINE
Bronze Member
rednik replied on Thu, Nov 14 2013 8:50 PM

Just to point out the obvious.

 

this technology is nothing to do with the wifi on a V1 or BV11, it's completely seperate.

 

its nothing to do with the wifi in your house, it's completely seperate.

 

its nothing to do with a wireless 1 and how pants they were.  It's completely separate (thank god)

Page 1 of 1 (6 items) | RSS